01620107

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2644-04

Traffic volume, often measured in relation to annual average daily traffic (AADT), is a fundamental output of traffic monitoring programs. At continuous count sites, unusual events or counter malfunctions periodically cause data loss, which influences AADT accuracy and precision. This paper evaluates five methods used to calculate AADT values from continuous count data, including the use of a simple average, the commonly adopted method developed by AASHTO (the AASHTO method), and methods that incorporate adjustments to the AASHTO method. The evaluation imposes data removal scenarios designed to simulate real-life causes of data loss to quantify the accuracy and precision improvements provided by these adjustments. Truck traffic data are used to reveal issues arising when volumes are low or when they exhibit unusual temporal patterns. Unlike the AASHTO method, which incorporates a weighted average and an hourly base time period, the FHWA method provides the most accurate and precise results in all data removal scenarios, according to the evaluation. Specifically, when up to 15 days of data are randomly removed, application of the FHWA method can be expected to produce errors within approximately ±1.4% of the true AADT value, 95% of the time. Results also demonstrate that including a weighted average improves AADT accuracy primarily, whereas the use of hourly rather than daily count data influences precision. If possible, practitioners contemplating the adoption of the FHWA method should assess its relative advantages within their local context.

01632580

17-02138

English

pp 30–38

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441728

Digital/other

Figures (5) ; References (6) ; Tables (4)

Accuracy; Annual average daily traffic; Calculation; Data quality; Methodology; Traffic counting; Truck traffic

Data and Information Technology; Freight Transportation; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 8 2016 10:47AM

• Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts at Signalized Intersections Using Existing Infrastructure: Opportunities and Challenges
• Cost of Independent Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects: Data, Challenges, and Variations
• Estimating Pedestrian Densities, Wait Times, and Flows with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Sensors
• Estimation of Average Payloads from Weigh-in-Motion Data
• Minimizing GPS Dependency for a Vehicle’s Trajectory Identification by Using Data from Smartphone Inertial Sensors and Onboard Diagnostics Device
• Modeling and Data Fusion of Dynamic Highway Traffic
• Municipal Vehicles as Sensor Platforms to Monitor Roadway Traffic
• Quality Assurance and Quality Control Processes for a Large-Scale Bicycle and Pedestrian Volume Data Program
• Quality Measure of Short-Duration Bicycle Counts
• Sensor Location Decision Model for Truck Flow Measurement
• Strategies for Monitoring Multiuse Trail Networks: Implications for Practice
• Up on The 606: Understanding the Use of a New Elevated Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail in Chicago, Illinois