01622933

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-13

Pavement markings are often supplemented with raised retroreflective pavement markers (RRPMs) to provide increased visibility, especially in wet nighttime conditions. To provide adequate visibility, highway agencies need to replace their markings and markers before they reach inadequate levels of performance. Currently, there are no quantitative visibility performance requirements for in-service RRPMs. Most markers are replaced on the basis of visual inspection or predetermined replacement schedules. This paper presents an initial investigation into the impacts of different measurement systems and different geometries on the quantitative evaluation of the visibility of RRPMs. A key question was how the different measurement geometries affected the retroreflective performance of RRPMs. The research found that when the observation angle was held at 0.2° and the entrance angle increased, the coefficient of luminous intensity also increased. This finding was true for every color and brand of marker for the geometries tested. There was a notable drop in performance when the evaluation geometry was changed from pavement marker geometry to pavement marking geometry. When the photometric range was used, the pavement marking geometry resulted in data that were 7.8% of the values from the standard marker geometry. Charge-coupled device photometer measurements resulted in pavement marking geometry results that were on average 6.7% of the value of the RRPM geometry. These values being close indicated that the two measurement types were comparable and that the markers could consistently be evaluated at the two distinct geometries.

01634573

17-00643

English

pp 113–120

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441711

Digital/other

Figures (4) ; References (6) ; Tables (7)

Geometry; Luminous intensity; Performance measurement; Retroreflectivity; Road markings; Testing

Highways; Maintenance and Preservation; Materials; Pavements

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 8 2016 10:08AM

• Addressing Raveling Resistance in Chip Seal Specifications
• Bridge Health Index: Study of Element Condition States and Importance Weights
• Cloud-Based Scalable Software for Optimal Long-Range, Network-Level Bridge Improvement Programming
• Development of a Modified Adhesion Test for Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealants
• Evaluating Transportation User Costs Based on Simulated Regional Network Models
• In-Vehicle Evaluation of Milled Rumble Strips in Pre– and Post–Chip Seal Maintenance Periods
• Method for Ranking Relative Importance of Structures to Virginia’s Roadway Network
• Modeling Long-Term Highway Staffing Requirements for State Transportation Agencies
• Modernizing and Streamlining Waterborne Traffic Paint Specifications
• Ohio Bridge Condition Index: Multilevel Cost-Based Performance Index for Bridge Systems
• Travel Quality Assessment of Urban Roads Based on International Roughness Index: Case Study in Colombia
• Use of Bridge Element Condition Reports to Measure Performance of Bridge Preservation
• Use of Carbon Nanotubes to Improve Fracture Toughness of Polymer Concrete
• Use of Crack Characteristics in Crack Sealing Performance Modeling and Network-Level Project Selection
• Use of Recursive Partitioning to Predict National Bridge Inventory Condition Ratings from National Bridge Elements Condition Data
• Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Bridge Inspections