01587789

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2593-06

Transportation planners and engineers need estimates of nonmotorized traffic volumes and analytical tools to plan and manage infrastructure for bicycling and walking. Direct demand models are useful, comparatively simple tools for the estimation of volumes from nonmotorized traffic counts and do not require detailed information from travel behavior inventories. However, few demand models for bicycling and walking have been validated. This paper extends the practice of nonmotorized traffic monitoring and modeling in three ways. First, procedures recommended in the FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide are followed to present estimates of annual average daily traffic (AADT) for each segment of the urban trail networks in two major U.S. cities: Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Columbus, Ohio. Second, independent variables constructed from nationally available data sets and the local characteristics of each trail system are used to estimate and validate direct demand models for AADT. Third, to assess the potential for the general application of the models, the results of cross-city validations are presented. Our results confirm that FHWA monitoring procedures can be used to characterize the variation in traffic flows on urban trail networks. Direct demand models for each city have reasonably good fits, but the predicted traffic volumes for more than one-third of the segments exceed the actual volumes by more than 60%. Cross validation results indicate that these models cannot yet be applied as predictive tools across cities. More experimentation is needed to assess the feasibility of developing generalized direct demand models for trails and other nonmotorized transportation networks.

01594375

16-3778

English

pp 47–59

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369732

Print

Figures (4) ; References (33) ; Tables (5)

Annual average daily traffic; Bikeways; Mathematical models; Nonmotorized transportation; Traffic estimation; Traffic surveillance; Trails; Validation

U.S. Federal Highway Administration

Direct demand forecasting

Columbus (Ohio); Minneapolis (Minnesota)

Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 12 2016 5:38PM

• Accuracy of Bicycle Counting with Pneumatic Tubes in Oregon
• Battery-Saving Communication Modes for Wireless Freeway Traffic Sensors
• Data-Cleaning Technique for Reliable Real-Life Travel Time Estimation: Use of Dedicated Short-Range Communications Probes on Rural Highways
• Estimating Daily Bicycle Counts in Seattle, Washington, from Seasonal and Weather Factors
• Identifying Factors to Improve Transportation Asset Management Program Sustainment: Applying Implementation Research and Change Management Principles
• Improved Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimation Processes
• Integrating Intersection Traffic Signal Data into a Traffic Monitoring Program
• Online Method to Impute Missing Loop Detector Data for Urban Freeway Traffic Control
• Quality Assurance for Traffic Count Data in National Parks: Ensuring Quality When Traffic Variability Is High
• Recommended Procedure to Adjust Inaccurate Weigh-in-Motion Data
• Toward a Better Estimation of Annual Average Daily Bicycle Traffic: Comparison of Methods for Calculating Daily Adjustment Factors