TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Improved Test Methods for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse and Fine Aggregate

Accession Number:

01562968

Record Type:

Monograph

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/172541.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309308533

Abstract:

Design and production of paving asphalt and portland cement concrete (PCC) mixtures rely on accurate, precise measurement of aggregate specific gravity and absorption. Aggregate specific gravities are needed to calculate the voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) and effective binder content of asphalt mixtures, which are key volumetric properties used in mix design and acceptance testing. For PCC, aggregate absorption is used to adjust water/ cement or water/cementitious material ratios which affect the workability of PCC and are a good indicator of PCC’s resistance to freezing and thawing and PCC’s durability. The current AASHTO standard test methods for aggregate specific gravity and absorption, namely, T 84, Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate, and T 85, Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, share several shortcomings in terms of subjectivity of the measurements, time requirements for conditioning and testing, and precision. The objective of NCHRP Project 4-35 was to develop test methods for determining the specific gravity and absorption of coarse and fine aggregates with improved accuracy, precision, ease of use, and time required for conditioning and testing, compared to the current AASHTO T 84 and T 85 methods. The key outcome of the research is the finding that AASHTO T 85 with several proposed changes, AASHTO T 84 (modified to remove and separately test P200 material), and ASTM D7172 (Standard Test Method for Determining the Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregates Using Infrared) provide a good balance of accuracy and precision compared to the other methods evaluated, including the current AASHTO T 85 and T 84. This finding was developed through a critical literature review on the basis of which an initial set of ten test methods was selected for evaluation in a series of five laboratory experiments and a ruggedness study. This report fully documents the research and includes the following two appendixes: Revised AASHTO T 85 and Revised AASHTO T 84 In addition, seven appendixes are available to download from the NCHRP Project 4-35 web page at http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=1614. These appendixes summarize the literature review, testing results of the experiments, and results of a ruggedness study.

Report/Paper Numbers:

Project 04-35

Language:

English

Authors:

Tran, Nam H
West, Randy C
Azari, Haleh

Pagination:

105p

Publication Date:

2015

Serial:

NCHRP Report

Issue Number: 805
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0077-5614

ISBN:

9780309308533

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Appendices; Bibliography; Figures; Tables

Uncontrolled Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Materials; Pavements; I36: Aggregates

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

May 15 2015 10:49AM