TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Are Intersections With Cycle Tracks Safer? A Control-Case Study Based On Automated Surrogate Safety Analysis Using Video Data

Accession Number:

01556585

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Abstract:

In recent years, cities in North America have been building cycle tracks with the intention of providing cyclists with a safer alternative to biking in the street. These facilities have been built and expanded but very little research has been done to investigate the safety impact of cycle tracks, in particular at intersections, where cyclists interact with turning-motor-vehicles. Some of the safety research has looked at observed injuries, finding some positive safety impacts of cycle tracks. The objective of this work is to investigate the safety effects of cycle tracks at intersections using a control-case study. For this purpose, a video-based method is proposed for analysing the post-encroachment time as a surrogate measure of the conflicts between cyclists and turning- vehicles traveling in the same direction. Using the city of Montreal as the case study, a sample of intersections with and without cycle tracks on the right and left sides were carefully selected accounting for intersection geometry and traffic volumes. A total of 90 hours of video were collected and processed in order to obtain cyclist and motor-vehicle trajectories and interactions. After cyclist and motor-vehicle interactions were defined, ordered logit models with random effects were developed to evaluate the safety effects of cycle tracks on conflicts at intersections. Among other results, it was found that intersection approaches with cycle tracks on the right are safer than intersection approaches with no cycle track; however, intersections with cycle tracks on the left compared to no cycle tracks were not found to have be significantly safer. As part of the contributions of this work, one can mention the extraction and use of disaggregate bicycle and vehicle flows in short time intervals such as 10 seconds intervals. The results identify that the likelihood of a cyclist being involved in a dangerous conflict increases with increasing turning- vehicle flow and decreases with cyclist group arrival.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper was sponsored by TRB committee ANF20 Bicycle Transportation. Alternate title: Are Intersections with Cycle Tracks Safer? Control Case Study Based on Automated Surrogate Safety Analysis Using Video Data.

Monograph Accession #:

01550057

Report/Paper Numbers:

15-4903

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Zangenehpour, Sohail
Strauss, Jillian
Miranda-Moreno, Luis F
Saunier, Nicolas

Pagination:

17p

Publication Date:

2015

Conference:

Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting

Location: Washington DC, United States
Date: 2015-1-11 to 2015-1-15
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

Digital/other

Features:

Figures; Maps; Photos; References; Tables

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I82: Accidents and Transport Infrastructure

Source Data:

Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2015 Paper #15-4903

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Dec 30 2014 1:38PM