TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Pavement Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation Activities

Accession Number:

01554207

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Abstract:

Preservation treatments help in extending the remaining service life of pavements, but at the same time, they may have considerable environmental impacts due to the acquisition of raw materials, transportation of the processed materials from extraction to production site, manufacturing of the final product, and the use of various equipment during the treatment process. Traditional and accelerated maintenance, repair and rehabilitation (MRR) techniques were identified for both flexible and rigid pavements. Environmental impacts of the commonly used MRR strategies were calculated in amounts of greenhouse gases emitted, energy consumed and resources used. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used, taking into account the life extension of the pavement for each type of strategy. LCA results showed that for flexible pavements, accelerated rehabilitation techniques like partial or full depth reclamation have less life cycle environmental impacts than traditional techniques like milling and overlay or total reconstruction. For rigid pavements, all the rehabilitation techniques are comparatively new. The environmental impacts were found to be similar for both traditional techniques like concrete full depth repair and accelerated techniques like precast concrete pavement systems. Minor treatment processes for both flexible and rigid pavements like fog seal, crack seal, concrete seal joints, diamond grinding, and concrete partial depth repair have minimum impacts with maximum benefits when the corresponding life extensions are compared. Overall results showed that traditional asphalt pavement MRRs have considerably higher environmental impacts than rigid pavement MRRs. The results obtained can assist highway construction management professionals to select environmentally sustainable MRR solutions.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper was sponsored by TRB committee ADC60 Waste Management and Resource Efficiency in Transportation.

Monograph Accession #:

01550057

Report/Paper Numbers:

15-4260

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Salem, Ossama (Sam)
Ghorai, Sudipta

Pagination:

23p

Publication Date:

2015

Conference:

Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting

Location: Washington DC, United States
Date: 2015-1-11 to 2015-1-15
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

Digital/other

Features:

Figures; References; Tables

Subject Areas:

Environment; Highways; Maintenance and Preservation; Pavements; I15: Environment; I61: Equipment and Maintenance Methods

Source Data:

Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2015 Paper #15-4260

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Dec 30 2014 1:23PM