01558129

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2532-17

Effective signal timing plans for emergency evacuation are crucial for public safety. Two conflicting objectives of emergency evacuation in a corridor are to increase throughput on the main street (evacuation route) and to decrease delay on the side streets. Previous studies have proved the effectiveness of using the static flashing yellow signal timing plan in evacuating a high number of vehicles. However, the static flashing yellow plan also yields extremely high delay on side streets. This study investigates a variant of the static flashing yellow plan called the dynamic flashing yellow (DFY) signal timing plan under a few reasonable assumptions. The DFY plan consists of two signal phases. Phase 1 is flashing yellow on the main street and flashing red on the side street, whereas Phase 2 is a red signal on the main street and a green signal on the side street. Three types of DFY plans are proposed, including fixed DFY, actuated DFY, and actuated and coordinated DFY. This study demonstrates that the DFY provides a high volume of evacuated vehicles with relatively lower delay to the side street traffic. Moreover, the DFY is adjustable to favor different weights between network throughput and average delay. To compare the DFY with the static flashing yellow and other plans, VISSIM is implemented to model a 4.1-mi corridor in Buffalo, New York. The DFY plan is further analyzed by method and cycle length. According to the Pareto frontier, the actuated and coordinated DFY with cycle lengths of 60 s and 120 s produces more desirable results (Pareto nondominated solutions) than other plans.

01582737

15-3414

English

pp 154–163

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369152

Print

Figures (5) ; References (26) ; Tables (1)

Disasters and emergency operations; Evacuation; Flashing traffic signals; Traffic delays; Traffic signal control systems; Traffic signal timing

VISSIM (Computer model)

Flashing yellow signals; Side streets; Throughput (Traffic)

Buffalo (New York)

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Policy; Security and Emergencies; I73: Traffic Control

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 1:08PM

• Agent-Based Evacuation Model Considering Field Effects and Government Advice
• Analysis of Transportation Network Vulnerability Under Flooding Disasters
• Barriers to Implementation of Climate Adaptation Frameworks by State Departments of Transportation
• Hurricane Evacuation Route Choice of Major Bridges in Miami Beach, Florida
• Integrating Stochastic Failure of Road Network and Road Recovery Strategy into Planning of Goods Distribution After a Large-Scale Earthquake
• Joint Evacuation and Emergency Traffic Management Model with Consideration of Emergency Response Needs
• Multimodal Evacuation Simulation and Scenario Analysis in Dense Urban Area: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Case Study
• Multimodal Transit Connectivity for Flexibility in Extreme Events
• Resilience of Coastal Transportation Networks Faced with Extreme Climatic Events
• Resilience Versus Risk: Assessing Cost of Climate Change Adaptation to California’s Transportation System and the City of Sacramento, California
• Risk and Resilience Analysis for Emergency Projects
• Roadmaps for Adaptation Measures of Transportation to Climate Change
• Selecting Four-Leg Intersections for Crossing Elimination in Evacuations
• Spatiotemporal Population Distribution Method for Emergency Evacuation: Case Study of New Orleans, Louisiana
• Supporting Mobility-Impaired Populations in Emergency Evacuations
• Unmanned Aircraft Systems Used for Disaster Management
• Vulnerability Evaluation of Logistics Transportation Networks Under Seismic Disasters