01555120

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-02

Alternative technical concepts (ATCs) have yielded innovative solutions to complicated design issues in a wide range of highway projects. Through ATCs, proposers are allowed to suggest modifications to a contract requirement to provide a project design equal to or better than the one described in the solicitation. However, the realization of such benefits requires a well-structured ATC mechanism, and the project’s solicitation documents need to be drafted in a manner that clearly communicates the owner’s project goals and ensures fairness and confidentiality to competing contractors. This paper describes the submittal, evaluation, approval, and review procedures currently followed by state transportation agencies to implement ATCs. The study employed a survey that was sent to all state departments of transportation (42 of which responded), in addition to a content analysis of the solicitation documents of 65 ATC projects from 24 agencies. The paper finds that care must be taken to ensure that competing contractors are not discouraged from pursuing ATCs as a result of onerous documentation requirements for ATC submittals. The results also show that the ATC submittal procedures should provide detailed guidance on the conduct and character of one-on-one meetings with competitors, the content of a responsive ATC submittal, and the procedures for the rectification of errors, omissions, and ambiguities. The document should also be clear about what constitutes an ATC and describe the ATC evaluation and review process, as well as the process for presenting proposed ATCs. The ATC evaluation criteria should be known when the solicitation is first published.

01582852

15-0769

English

pp 10–18

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369176

Print

Figures (2) ; References (31) ; Tables (3)

Construction projects; Contracting; Evaluation; Procedures; Solicitations; State departments of transportation

Alternative technical concepts

Administration and Management; Construction; Highways; I10: Economics and Administration; I50: Construction and Supervision of Construction

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 12:21PM

• Application of Work Zone Road User Costs to Determine Schedule-Related Incentives and Disincentives: Conceptual Framework
• Comparison of Density Tests for Thin Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays
• Concepts to Enhance Specification and Inspection of Curing Effectiveness in Concrete Pavement Design and Construction
• Cost and Schedule Performance Benchmarks of U.S. Transportation Public–Private Partnership Projects: Preliminary Results
• Determinants of Variability in Preliminary Engineering Funding: Program-Level Analysis
• Economic Haul Radius as Affected by Diesel Fuel Cost
• Laboratory Evaluation and Field Construction of Roller-Compacted Concrete for Testing Under Accelerated Loading
• Mapping of Practices of State Transportation Agencies for Consultant Oversight of Construction Engineering and Inspection Services
• Models of Asphalt Concrete Field Compactibility with Focus on Lift Thickness
• Performance-Based Warranty Contracts for Pavement Markings: Experience and Lessons Learned in the State of Utah
• Policies and Procedures for Successful Implementation of Alternative Technical Concepts
• Relationship Between Early Contractor Involvement and Financial Performance in the Rebuilding of Infrastructure in Christchurch, New Zealand
• Relationship Between Surface Profile Characteristics and the Need for Localized Roughness Correction: Investigation Based on Bump Rating Panel Data
• Structural Health Monitoring System for Ironton–Russell Bridge, Ohio and Kentucky: Phase 1. Substructure Construction
• Testing of Dowel Alignment and Development of a Dowel Bar Alignment Specification for Illinois Tollways
• Trends in Quality Management Approaches to Design–Build Transportation Projects
• U.S. Partnering Programs and International Partnering Contracts and Alliances: Comparative Analysis