01555020

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-10

Transportation agencies increasingly allow design–build teams and construction contractors to incorporate alternative technical concepts (ATCs) into proposals for highway projects. The ATC approach allows proposers to suggest modifications to a contract requirement that would result in the project being equal to or better than the design in the solicitation. This paper investigates current procurement policies and presubmittal procedures followed by state transportation agencies in the implementation of ATCs in transportation projects. The paper reports survey results of state departments of transportation (DOTs) that generated responses from 42 state DOTs. These results were compared with a content analysis of solicitation documents of 65 ATC projects from 24 DOTs. The results showed that although ATC usage was most common in design–build projects, ATCs have been successfully implemented in nearly all project delivery methods. The study showed that incorporation of ATCs into the procurement process allowed for clarification of solicitation documents in a confidential manner. The most important factors for the success of the ATC procurement process are the ability to safeguard ATCs that contain proprietary content and the guarantee of ATC confidentiality. During proposal presubmittal, the agency will need to determine procedural issues involved in confidential meetings and the confidentiality of preproposal communications.

01582852

15-0437

English

pp 78–86

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369176

Print

Figures (2) ; References (27) ; Tables (4)

Construction projects; Contracting; Policy; Procurement; State departments of transportation; Surveys

Alternative technical concepts

Administration and Management; Construction; Highways; I10: Economics and Administration; I52: Construction of Pavements and Surfacings

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 12:16PM

• Application of Work Zone Road User Costs to Determine Schedule-Related Incentives and Disincentives: Conceptual Framework
• Comparison of Density Tests for Thin Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays
• Concepts to Enhance Specification and Inspection of Curing Effectiveness in Concrete Pavement Design and Construction
• Cost and Schedule Performance Benchmarks of U.S. Transportation Public–Private Partnership Projects: Preliminary Results
• Determinants of Variability in Preliminary Engineering Funding: Program-Level Analysis
• Economic Haul Radius as Affected by Diesel Fuel Cost
• Laboratory Evaluation and Field Construction of Roller-Compacted Concrete for Testing Under Accelerated Loading
• Mapping of Practices of State Transportation Agencies for Consultant Oversight of Construction Engineering and Inspection Services
• Models of Asphalt Concrete Field Compactibility with Focus on Lift Thickness
• Performance-Based Warranty Contracts for Pavement Markings: Experience and Lessons Learned in the State of Utah
• Relationship Between Early Contractor Involvement and Financial Performance in the Rebuilding of Infrastructure in Christchurch, New Zealand
• Relationship Between Surface Profile Characteristics and the Need for Localized Roughness Correction: Investigation Based on Bump Rating Panel Data
• Structural Health Monitoring System for Ironton–Russell Bridge, Ohio and Kentucky: Phase 1. Substructure Construction
• Submittal and Evaluation Procedures for Alternative Technical Concepts
• Testing of Dowel Alignment and Development of a Dowel Bar Alignment Specification for Illinois Tollways
• Trends in Quality Management Approaches to Design–Build Transportation Projects
• U.S. Partnering Programs and International Partnering Contracts and Alliances: Comparative Analysis