01519115

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2418-14

The Michigan Department of Transportation (DOT) supports a statewide network of intercity bus services, including five routes operated under the FTA Section 5311 (f) program. To assist with planning activities for the state’s intercity bus network, the Michigan DOT conducted an onboard survey of intercity bus passengers in the state in spring 2011. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) was retained to analyze the 533 surveys obtained from this effort. This paper presents the results of the TTI analysis of the Michigan DOT spring 2011 intercity bus surveys. The survey results showed that three-quarters of the intercity bus passengers were from urban areas and the remaining one-quarter were from rural areas. Most passengers were traveling for personal reasons such as visits to family or friends or vacation. One-third of the surveyed passengers were from zero-vehicle households. If the bus service were not available, 59% of the passengers would drive, 19% would use an airplane, and 22% would not make the trip. Of zero-vehicle households, 31% of passengers would not make the trip; this result indicated a key role for the intercity bus service in supporting personal mobility. Other demographic groups that benefitted from the service included females and persons with annual household income less than $20,000; both groups had a higher propensity not to make the trip in the absence of the bus service. The findings from the survey suggested that the Michigan intercity bus network was a critical transportation option for residents and visitors in the state and that bus passenger onboard surveys provided valuable information to support planning efforts.

01557108

14-3317

English

pp 116–122

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295635

Print

Figures (1) ; Maps; References (13) ; Tables (3)

Bus transportation; Females; Low income groups; Mobility; Passenger transportation; Ridership; Travel surveys

Transit onboard surveys

Michigan

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 3:09PM

• All Aboard at All Doors: Route Selection and Running-Time Savings Estimation for Multiscenario All-Door Bus Boarding
• Buses with High Level of Service in Nantes, France: Characteristics and Results of the BusWay Compared with Light Rail Transit
• Combinatorial Optimization for the Guangzhou, China, Bus Rapid Transit System: Multiple Bus Substops and Docking Bays
• Evaluation of Presignals at Oversaturated Signalized Intersections
• Factors Contributing to Bus Lane Obstruction and Usage in New York City: Does Design Matter?
• Flex Scheduling for Bus Arrival Time Prediction
• Jobs-Housing Balance of Bus Commuters in Beijing: Exploration with Large-Scale Synthesized Smart Card Data
• Modeling Bus Dwell Time with Decision Tree–Based Methods
• Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies
• Optimal Connected Urban Bus Network of Priority Lanes
• Quantifying the Effects of Modal Conflicts on Transit Reliability
• Regulating Intercity Bus Stops in New York City
• Transit Signal Priority with Connected Vehicle Technology
• User Behavior in Multiroute Bus Corridors: Analysis by a Web-Based Survey