01516388

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2419-02

After a decade of busway investment, light rail transit (LRT) has reemerged as an inner-city transit investment in Australia. In the next decade, Australian LRT network size will grow by about 25%. Analysis shows that Australian LRT is dominated by the streetcar network in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (one of the largest in the world). Although LRT networks have not expanded much, ridership growth has been substantial (more than 46% between 2001 and 2012) and well above systemwide (all mode) growth of public transport ridership in most cities. In general, the service level (i.e., frequency and span of hours) on Australian trams was low compared with that of European and U.S. systems. Also, service levels did not keep pace with ridership growth, which acted to increase the ridership productivity of most Australian LRT. Melbourne led Australia in terms of ridership productivity (passengers per vehicle kilometer); Melbourne Tram Route 109 had the highest ridership (935,000 annually) and service effectiveness (11.5 passengers per vehicle kilometer). Between 2006 and 2013, Australian LRT ridership growth was higher than ridership growth in the United States. However, U.S. service levels grew substantially more than service levels in Australia did during this same period. The outcome was that, although Australian service effectiveness grew by 20%, service effectiveness in the United States fell by 8%. Recently, Australian LRT planning has focused on the so-called streetcar struggle (i.e., the action taken to reduce the congestion effects of growing road traffic on LRT performance). Medium-term plans for new system development identified LRT as a solution to facilitate urban access, urban redevelopment, and reliable and higher-capacity transit in congested inner-urban bus transit contexts.

01557109

14-0784

English

pp 11–22

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295543

Print

Figures (5) ; References (40) ; Tables (3)

Level of service; Light rail transit; Ridership; Streetcars; Trend (Statistics)

Australia; Melbourne (Australia); United States

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 2:20PM

• Accommodation of Long-Term Growth on North America’s Commuter Railroads
• Are Park-and-Rides Saving the Environment or Just Saving Parking Costs? Case Study of Denver, Colorado, Light Rail System
• Do Light Rail Transit Planning Decisions Affect Metropolitan Transit Performance? Examination of Eight U.S. Metropolitan Areas with Light Rail Transit Backbones
• Impacts of Real-Time Passenger Information Signs in Rail Stations at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
• International Study of Current and Potential Social Media Applications in Unplanned Passenger Rail Disruptions
• Is This Seat Taken? Multifaceted Research Study to Inform the Chicago, Illinois, Transit Authority’s Future Rail Car Seating Design
• Light Rail Transit Urban Insertion and Safety: European Experience
• Park-and-Ride Access Station Choice Model for Cross-Regional Commuting: Case Study of Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada
• Public Transit Catchment Areas: The Curious Case of Cycle–Transit Users
• Rail Transit: Exploration with Emphasis on Networks with Ring Lines
• Strategic Station Access Planning for Commuter Rail: Balancing Park-and-Ride with Other Modes