TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Chinatown Curbside Management Study: Case Study on Implementing an Adaptive Public Outreach Framework in a Traditional Neighborhood

Accession Number:

01472682

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Abstract:

Manhattan’s Chinatown has a rich cultural heritage, which provides a vivid experience for its many users. This experience generates a considerable amount of vehicular and pedestrian traffic resulting in curbside challenges. Using best practices from similar neighborhood transportation studies, the New York City Department of Transportation’s Chinatown Curbside Management Study (CCMS) sought to address these challenges by developing curbside improvements. An interactive and transparent process was critical to the study’s success. The CCMS adapted its public outreach to provide increased engagement to a hierarchical, traditional, predominantly non-English speaking, and over-studied community. Numerous stakeholder meetings and public workshops were held throughout the course of the study. A formal workshop was restructured to include a simultaneous neighborhood park workshop. Bringing the workshop to the people established a rapport and fostered a relationship with the public. Instead of writing off poor meeting attendance, the project team adapted to allow better engagement. Similarly, various community groups hosted smaller-scale workshops, held in native languages, to provide personalized interaction. Participants played a board game, which focused on identified issues, potential improvements, and the associated trade-offs of these treatments. Most recently, a mobile open house traveled through the study area to provide information on the proposed pilot treatments and collect feedback. This case study is a useful lesson for public involvement practitioners, particularly when engaging diverse and unique communities. As robust public involvement project portfolios are developed and implemented, it is critical that practitioners learn from and listen to the community and utilize an adaptive engagement approach.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper was sponsored by TRB committee ADA60 Public Involvement in Transportation.

Monograph Accession #:

01470560

Report/Paper Numbers:

13-0381

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Camay, Stephanie
Gray, Nathan
Stein, David
Maguire, Thomas
Sanagavarapu, Suchitra
Leung, Jennifer
Mosseri, Gill
Jordan, Patrick B

Pagination:

17p

Publication Date:

2013

Conference:

Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting

Location: Washington DC, United States
Date: 2013-1-13 to 2013-1-17
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

Digital/other

Features:

References (32)

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; Safety and Human Factors; I21: Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

Source Data:

Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2013 Paper #13-0381

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Feb 5 2013 12:13PM