01373545

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2274-03

http://scholar.google.com...idge&publication_year=2012

FTA apportions Section 5307 urbanized area (UZA) formula funds to census-designated UZAs. When UZAs contain multiple recipients of Section 5307 funds, FTA leaves it up to local officials to determine the suballocations to the multiple recipients. Little documentation exists on the question of how to allocate the funds on a local level. The more agencies within a UZA, the more complex the issue becomes. Local officials within the UZAs must develop methods of allocating funds that satisfy the desires of each of the regional stakeholders. The nature in which metropolitan areas grow leads to multiple transit agencies existing within the UZA and desiring access to UZA formula funds. This report identifies seven complex metropolitan areas across the United States with multiple Section 5307 fund recipients, identifies the problems experienced with allocating Section 5307 funds at the local level, and identifies three models of funding distribution techniques. The models of funding distribution include formula, formula and regional project selection, and regional project selection and local negotiations. Though only three models are identified, there is much variation within each model. The report provides details on the allocation within each region.

01449088

12-4614

English

pp 23–29

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309223171

Print

References; Tables

Government funding; Local government agencies; Metropolitan areas; Resource allocation; Sustainable transportation

U.S. Federal Transit Administration

Finance; Public Transportation; I10: Economics and Administration; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:25PM

• Analytically Derived Versus Numerically Derived Urban Transit Guidelines: Case Study of Utrecht, Netherlands
• Analyzing Passenger Incidence Behavior in Heterogeneous Transit Services Using Smartcard Data and Schedule-Based Assignment
• Assessing the Impact of Travel Path Choice on London’s Rail Network Using an Automatic Fare Collection System
• Bus Dwell-Time Model of Main Urban Route Stops: Case Study in Madrid, Spain
• Bus-Holding Control Strategies: Simulation-Based Evaluation and Guidelines for Implementation
• Development of Measurement System for Public Transport Performance
• Effects of Personal Proenvironmental Attitudes on Mode Choice Behavior: New Ecofriendly Water Transit System in Seoul, South Korea
• Effects of Tube Strikes on Journey Times in Transport Network of London
• Extraboard Performance: TriMet Case Study
• How Do People Perceive Service Attributes at Transit Facilities? Examination of Perceptions of Transit Service by Transit User Demographics and Trip Characteristics
• Key Variables Affecting Decisions of Bus Replacement Age and Total Costs
• Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Small Urban Transit
• New York City’s East River Ferry: Expanding Passenger Ferry Service and Stimulating Economic Development in the New York City Region
• Passenger Transmission and Productiveness of Transit Lines with High Loads
• Public Policy Objectives and Urban Transit: Case of Passenger Ferries in the New York City Region
• Public Transportation Today and Tomorrow
• Quantifying Reliability of Transit Service in Zurich, Switzerland: Case Study of Bus Line 31
• Simulating the Travel Time Impact of Missed Transit Connections
• Steps to Leading Change: A Transportation Agency’s Business Plan Approach
• Strategic Look at Friday Exceptions in Weekday Schedules for Urban Transit: Improving Service, Capturing Leisure Markets, and Achieving Cost Savings by Mining Data on Automated Fare Collection Ridership