01373302

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2297-05

http://scholar.google.com...hung&publication_year=2012

This study analyzes the effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion through econometric analysis. The results show that there is some evidence that impact fees might reduce congestion by creating disincentives to residential development and job creation. However, direct evidence of a negative effect of impact fees in development and job growth is not found. There is no evidence that the difference in impact fees between central cities and outer areas promotes a more compact urban form. Likewise, there is no evidence that more road impact fees decrease congestion through more investment in infrastructure. This finding might be because impact fees usually finance local roads but congestion is concentrated on freeways and arterials or because there is a spatial, temporal, or financial mismatch between the collection and investment of impact fees. There is a clear, significant, and substantial positive relationship between density and congestion; this relationship indicates a weak increase in transit use in denser environments or a potential increase in automotive travel through higher trip frequency. However, other urban form variables related to the distribution of that density have a negative effect on congestion, indicating that certain urban configurations could decrease congestion. Finally, changes in congestion are negatively correlated with the congestion levels at the beginning of the period; this finding suggests that congestion is increasing faster in those areas that used to be less congested.

01470980

12-2601

English

pp 38–46

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309262989

Print

References; Tables

Econometric models; Financing; Highways; Impact fees; Jobs; Population density; Traffic congestion; Urban areas; Urban development

Florida

Economics; Finance; Highways; Policy; I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:10PM

• Accounting for Correlations: Price Adjustments in Unit-Cost Construction Contracts
• Do Travelers Pay for Managed-Lane Travel as They Claimed They Would? Before-and-After Study of Travelers on Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas
• Effects of Road Investments on Economic Output and Induced Travel Demand: Evidence for Urbanized Areas in the United States
• Equity Evaluation of Fees for Vehicle Miles Traveled in Texas
• Generating Revenue to Fund Public–Private Partnerships for Reconstruction of Freeway Systems in Metropolitan Areas
• Impact of Peak and Off-Peak Tolls on Traffic in San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge Corridor in California
• Impact of Regulation and Network Topology on Effectiveness of Roadway Privatization
• Integrating Transportation and Economic Models to Assess Impact of Infrastructure Investment
• Managed Arterials: New Application of Managed Lanes Concept
• Marginal-Cost Vehicle Mileage Fee
• Measuring Per Mile Risk for Pay-As-You-Drive Automobile Insurance
• Nonpublic Funding Options Available to Virginia Department of Transportation for Interstate Safety Rest Areas
• Relationship Between Vehicle Miles Traveled and Economic Activity
• Relationship of Transportation Access and Connectivity to Local Economic Outcomes: Statistical Analysis
• Risk Allocation in Toll Highway Concessions in Spain: Lessons from Economic Recession
• Risk-Based Benefit–Cost Analysis of Information Technology Tools for Program Management
• Role of Context in Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing
• The Chicago Skyway in Illinois: Implications of Local Initiative, Decentralized Control, and Independent Financing
• Valuing Public-Sector Revenue Risk Exposure in Transportation Public–Private Partnerships
• Willingness to Pay for High-Occupancy Toll Lanes: Empirical Analysis from I-15 and I-394