01372690

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2274-10

http://scholar.google.com...Arem&publication_year=2012

Urban transit guidelines yield optimal network characteristics relating to factors such as stop density, network density, service frequency, and network hierarchy. These guidelines are typically derived from a simple analytical formulation of the bilevel network design problem. This optimization problem can be solved analytically only when simplifying assumptions are made regarding the demand distribution, local constraints, and travel behavior. The primary objective of this paper is to verify the validity of the assumptions underlying analytically derived guidelines. To this end, a new numerical optimization tool is developed and applied to the design of several detailed topological transit networks (including routes and line-specific properties) for the medium-sized Dutch city of Utrecht, Netherlands. Average network characteristics are derived, and a comparison is made between the existing analytically derived guidelines, the new numerically derived optimal characteristics, and the characteristics of the present network. Both analytically derived and numerically derived guidelines recommend lower stop densities, coarser networks, and higher frequencies than those found in real life. Furthermore, the introduction of zone lines would improve network quality, while express lines are beneficial only for large demand concentrations. Although existing (typically analytically derived) guidelines are found to be in line with numerically derived guidelines, the former are less suitable because local constraints are not accounted for, and only average network characteristics are computed. Therefore, the detailed network designs that are numerically derived in this study are easier to implement.

01449088

12-2414

English

pp 93–99

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309223171

Print

Figures; References; Tables

Case studies; Guidelines; Mathematical models; Network analysis (Planning); Optimization; Urban transit; Validity

Network design

Utrecht (Netherlands)

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:09PM

• Analyzing Passenger Incidence Behavior in Heterogeneous Transit Services Using Smartcard Data and Schedule-Based Assignment
• Assessing the Impact of Travel Path Choice on London’s Rail Network Using an Automatic Fare Collection System
• Bus Dwell-Time Model of Main Urban Route Stops: Case Study in Madrid, Spain
• Bus-Holding Control Strategies: Simulation-Based Evaluation and Guidelines for Implementation
• Developing Sustainable Methods of Distributing Federal Transit Funds: Three Models of Funding Distribution in Complex Metropolitan Planning Areas
• Development of Measurement System for Public Transport Performance
• Effects of Personal Proenvironmental Attitudes on Mode Choice Behavior: New Ecofriendly Water Transit System in Seoul, South Korea
• Effects of Tube Strikes on Journey Times in Transport Network of London
• Extraboard Performance: TriMet Case Study
• How Do People Perceive Service Attributes at Transit Facilities? Examination of Perceptions of Transit Service by Transit User Demographics and Trip Characteristics
• Key Variables Affecting Decisions of Bus Replacement Age and Total Costs
• Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Small Urban Transit
• New York City’s East River Ferry: Expanding Passenger Ferry Service and Stimulating Economic Development in the New York City Region
• Passenger Transmission and Productiveness of Transit Lines with High Loads
• Public Policy Objectives and Urban Transit: Case of Passenger Ferries in the New York City Region
• Public Transportation Today and Tomorrow
• Quantifying Reliability of Transit Service in Zurich, Switzerland: Case Study of Bus Line 31
• Simulating the Travel Time Impact of Missed Transit Connections
• Steps to Leading Change: A Transportation Agency’s Business Plan Approach
• Strategic Look at Friday Exceptions in Weekday Schedules for Urban Transit: Improving Service, Capturing Leisure Markets, and Achieving Cost Savings by Mining Data on Automated Fare Collection Ridership