01371053

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2303-11

http://scholar.google.com...chen&publication_year=2012

The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) in Washington State has developed a set of procedures and methods for project and program evaluation that generally fall into the category of transportation benefit–cost analysis. The purpose of these methods is to be able to produce information about project or program performance relative to performance under a baseline set of conditions in which the project or program has not been implemented. PSRC used these benefit–cost analysis methods to develop and evaluate regional transportation planning alternatives during its most recent planning process. The creation of alternative regional transportation plans for analysis is not entirely unlike the development of investment portfolios. Acceptance of the findings of a comprehensive benefit–cost analysis as the appropriate analytical framework solves many, but not all, of the problems of practical implementation of a framework for evaluation of a scenario. Performance of a truly comprehensive benefit–cost analysis in a complex practical setting, however, introduces some empirical and policy challenges. PSRC has taken practical steps toward a more systematic approach to an alternative method of analysis. Incorporation of user benefit analysis into the process of evaluation of a scenario produces a natural shift toward consideration of development and selection of a scenario as an investment optimization problem. The paper explores additional approaches that might further advance the state of the practice in regional transportation planning.

01470174

12-1781

English

pp 99–107

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309263023

Print

Figures; References

Alternatives analysis; Benefit cost analysis; Evaluation; Regional planning; State of the practice; Transportation planning; User benefits

Puget Sound Council of Governments

Puget Sound Region

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I21: Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:05PM

• Application of Socioeconomic Model System for Activity-Based Modeling: Experience from Southern California
• Comparison of Four-Step Versus Tour-Based Models for Prediction of Travel Behavior Before and After Transportation System Changes
• Development of Surveys for Study of Departure Time Choice: Two-Stage Approach to Efficient Design
• Estimating Mobile-Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Los Angeles County, California: Web-Based Tool for Calculation of Benefits of Transportation Improvement Projects for Reduced Emissions
• Integrated Land Use–Transport Model System with Dynamic Time-Dependent Activity–Travel Microsimulation
• Joint Model of Residential Relocation Choice and Underlying Causal Factors
• Outcome of Transportation Projects Under Uncertainty: Examination of Benefit–Cost Ratios and Other Impacts
• Practical Guidelines for Estimation of Rest Area Use on Rural Interstates and Arterial Highways
• Quantitative Approaches for Project Prioritization: Case Study in Puget Sound, Washington
• Recent Practices in Regional Modeling of Nonmotorized Travel
• Sustainable and Healthy Travel Choices and the Built Environment: Analyses of Green and Active Access to Rail Transit Stations Along Individual Corridors
• Trip Rates and Accessibility: Gleaning Basic Planning Information from Activity-Based Travel Demand Model