01371001

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2297-02

http://scholar.google.com...llis&publication_year=2012

The Texas state gas tax has been 20 cents per gallon since 1991, and the federal gas tax has been 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993. The gas tax is not only stagnant but also depreciating in value because of inflation. Thus, the money needed to maintain the infrastructure and improve roadways is not being adequately generated. One proposed alternative to the gas tax is the creation of a fee for vehicle miles traveled (VMT), with equity being a crucial issue. This research used Texas data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey to consider the equity impacts of four VMT-fee scenarios. Data were filtered and weighted to reflect results representative of Texas vehicle-owning households in 2008. Each scenario was run both statically and dynamically under the assumption that the VMT fee would replace the state gas tax. On the basis of quantitative measures, the vertical equity of all proposed VMT-fee scenarios and that of the current state gas tax were similar. In terms of horizontal equity, Scenario 4 was designed to be inherently horizontally equitable: charging different rates for travel on urban roadways and rural roadways corresponding to funding needs associated with that roadway type. Scenario 3, which favored fuel-efficient vehicles, was found to be the least horizontally equitable and caused rural households to contribute the highest percentage of revenue of all scenarios considered. All other scenarios were found to be more horizontally equitable than the current state gas tax.

01470980

12-0252

English

pp 11–20

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309262989

Print

Figures; References; Tables

Economic analysis; Equity; Fees; Mileage-based user fees; Road pricing; User charges; Vehicle miles of travel

Texas

Economics; Finance; Highways; Policy; I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 4:53PM

• Accounting for Correlations: Price Adjustments in Unit-Cost Construction Contracts
• Do Travelers Pay for Managed-Lane Travel as They Claimed They Would? Before-and-After Study of Travelers on Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas
• Effects of Impact Fees on Urban Form and Congestion in Florida
• Effects of Road Investments on Economic Output and Induced Travel Demand: Evidence for Urbanized Areas in the United States
• Generating Revenue to Fund Public–Private Partnerships for Reconstruction of Freeway Systems in Metropolitan Areas
• Impact of Peak and Off-Peak Tolls on Traffic in San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge Corridor in California
• Impact of Regulation and Network Topology on Effectiveness of Roadway Privatization
• Integrating Transportation and Economic Models to Assess Impact of Infrastructure Investment
• Managed Arterials: New Application of Managed Lanes Concept
• Marginal-Cost Vehicle Mileage Fee
• Measuring Per Mile Risk for Pay-As-You-Drive Automobile Insurance
• Nonpublic Funding Options Available to Virginia Department of Transportation for Interstate Safety Rest Areas
• Relationship Between Vehicle Miles Traveled and Economic Activity
• Relationship of Transportation Access and Connectivity to Local Economic Outcomes: Statistical Analysis
• Risk Allocation in Toll Highway Concessions in Spain: Lessons from Economic Recession
• Risk-Based Benefit–Cost Analysis of Information Technology Tools for Program Management
• Role of Context in Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing
• The Chicago Skyway in Illinois: Implications of Local Initiative, Decentralized Control, and Independent Financing
• Valuing Public-Sector Revenue Risk Exposure in Transportation Public–Private Partnerships
• Willingness to Pay for High-Occupancy Toll Lanes: Empirical Analysis from I-15 and I-394