01332941

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2217-15

http://scholar.google.com...ites&publication_year=2011

Many studies show that carsharing reduces transportation costs for a large segment of the population. Carsharing also reduces the number of private vehicles on the road because carshare members do not purchase their own cars. However, the traditional carsharing business model is difficult to scale geographically to neighborhoods with lower population densities because the operator must bear the upfront fixed cost of purchasing or leasing the vehicles in the fleet. In contrast to traditional carsharing, peer-to-peer (P2P) carsharing allows car owners to convert their personal vehicles into shared cars that can be rented to other drivers on a short-term basis. This model helps to improve the situation in which most privately owned vehicles sit idle more than 90% of the day. P2P carsharing alleviates upfront costs and thus is more economically consistent with lower-density neighborhoods than is traditional carsharing. As a result, P2P carsharing provides greater potential for car accessibility than traditional carsharing does. Several new service companies are dedicated to P2P carsharing. A methodology was developed to assess the market feasibility of P2P carsharing. The methodology was applied to develop a case study of P2P carsharing in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The market for P2P carsharing was found to be economically viable. However, uncertain and fragmented public policy and car insurance regimes threatened the growth and investment in P2P carsharing.

01359313

11-3463

English

pp 119-126

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167482

Print

Figures (2) ; References (20) ; Tables (3)

Accessibility; Automobile insurance; Automobile ownership; Case studies; Economic growth; Market assessment; Peer groups; Public policy; Vehicle sharing

Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania)

Passenger Transportation; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 6:31PM

• Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness of Employment Transportation Services
• Assessing Options to Enhance Bicycle and Transit Integration
• Can River Ferries Deliver Smart Growth? Experience of CityCats in Brisbane, Australia
• Comparative Study of Pedestrian Accessibility to Transit Stations Using Free and Proprietary Network Data
• Configuration of Innovative Minibus Service in the Lisbon, Portugal, Municipality: Spatial–Temporal Assessment
• Cost-Effective Approaches to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Public Transportation in Los Angeles, California
• Demographic Analysis of Route Choice for Public Transit
• Development of Web-Based Transit Trip-Planning System Based on Service-Oriented Architecture
• Differences in Travel Behavior and Demand Potential of Tram- and Bus-Based Neighborhoods: Evidence from a Cluster Analysis
• Effect of Real-Time Transit Information on Dynamic Path Choice of Passengers
• Impact of Gasoline Prices on Transit Ridership in Washington State
• Income Effects and Other New Findings on Complexity of Transit Tours
• Measuring Service Gaps: Accessibility-Based Transit Need Index
• Mobile Transit Information from Universal Design and Crowdsourcing
• Panel Data Analysis to Identify Covariates of Longevity and Patronage of Community Shuttles in New Jersey
• Predicting the Mean and Variance of Transit Segment and Route Travel Times
• Psychological Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention Toward Future Sky Train Usage in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
• Real-Time Ridesharing: Opportunities and Challenges in Using Mobile Phone Technology to Improve Rideshare Services
• Thinking Outside the Box to Expand Metropolitan Travel Choices