|
Title: Comparison of Earthwork Computation Methods
Accession Number: 01341186
Record Type: Component
Record URL: Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Find a library where document is available Abstract: Modern technologies for data collection, data processing, and highway design allow for accurate representation of terrain-specific information to support volume computations for earthwork. These technologies support the representation of existing ground, design, and final as-built surfaces that can be overlaid and differenced to obtain volumes. However, most state highway agencies still use, or even specify, the average-end-area method, which relies on a coarse abstraction of cross sections. Results of an investigation of three highway design and construction data sets indicated, as expected, that when the cross-section interval was decreased, average-end-area volumes approached those computed by the surface-to-surface method. There could be exceptions, explainable by coincidence of the arbitrary cross-section interval and random variability of the terrain. Study results indicated that differences between the two methods could approach 5% when the cross-section interval was 100 ft. On one of the tested data sets, this difference in construction costs represented $112,500 for fill and $95,800 for cut.
Monograph Accession #: 01352159
Report/Paper Numbers: 11-2454
Language: English
Authors: Hintz, CassieVonderohe, Alan PPagination: pp 100-104
Publication Date: 2011
ISBN: 9780309167291
Media Type: Print
Features: Figures
(7)
; References
(5)
; Tables
(3)
TRT Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Subject Areas: Construction; Data and Information Technology; Design; Highways; I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I51: Earthworks and Soil Drainage
Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Feb 17 2011 6:10PM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|