01025716

English

http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1980-09

Adaptive cruise control (ACC) is a rapidly emerging in-vehicle technology that can enhance or degrade driving safety. A critical factor governing the safety benefit of ACC concerns the driver’s ability to assume control of the vehicle in situations that exceed ACC capabilities. The effectiveness of various warning modalities for reengaging distracted drivers during severe braking situations that exceed ACC capability was examined. Warnings that paired a visual icon with sound, seat vibration, or brake pulsation or that combined all three cues were compared. A total of 60 participants drove for 35 min in the National Advanced Driving Simulator. Drivers experienced two severe, four moderate, and eight mild braking situations. ACC could accommodate all but the two severe situations without driver intervention. It also provided a substantial benefit during mild events of lead vehicle braking, enabling drivers to maintain a longer, more consistent minimum time to collision. Unlike performance in previous studies, ACC did not decrease safety during severe braking situations. The combination of a visual icon with sound, seat vibration, or brake pulsation led to slower brake reaction time in severe braking situations, but the grouping of all four warning strategies led to a similar minimum time to collision and maximum braking. In contrast to several previous studies, these results suggest that drivers can effectively assume control when warned that ACC braking authority has been exceeded. Additional research is needed to identify the boundary conditions that specify when drivers can successfully intervene and retake control and whether a multimodal combination of cues can be crafted to speed rather than slow driver response.

HRIS

Print

pp 49-56

01041093

2006

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

0309099900

Figures (3) ; References (46) ; Tables (1)

Audible warning devices in vehicles; Autonomous intelligent cruise control; Braking; Distraction; Drivers; In vehicle warning systems; In-vehicle alerting systems; In-vehicle icons; National Advanced Driving Simulator; Reaction time; Seat vibration

Highways; Safety and Human Factors; Vehicles and Equipment; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor; I91: Vehicle Design and Safety

Jan 18 2007 9:30AM

• Assessing Driver Distraction from Cell Phone Use: A Simulator-Based Study
• Design of Simulator Scenarios to Study Effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control Systems
• Driver Response to Rainfall on Urban Expressways
• Enhancing Highway Geometric Design: Development of Interactive Virtual Reality Visualization System with Open-Source Technologies
• Eyeglance Behavior of Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Drivers
• Factors Affecting Common Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Types: Road Safety Priorities in an Aging Society
• Highway Traffic Response to Dynamic Fog Warning and Speed Advisory Messages
• Hindsight Judgment of Driver Fault in Traffic Accident Analysis: Misusing the Science of Accident Reconstruction
• How Multitasking Interacts with Visual Impairment and Age on Measures of Driving Performance
• How Reliable Is This Route? Predictive Travel Time and Reliability for Anticipatory Traveler Information Systems
• Impact of Highway Safety Flares on Driver Behavior
• Implications of Risk Perception Under Assumption of Rational Driver Behavior
• Modeling Pipeline Driving Behaviors: Hidden Markov Model Approach
• Responses to Enhanced Wildlife Advisories in a Simulated Environment
• Rewards for Safe Driving Behavior: Influence on Following Distance and Speed
• Simple Way to Use Closed-Circuit Television Road Images for Poor-Visibility Information