00615779

Component

http://www.uctc.net/papers/064.pdf

Federal subsidies of public transit, particularly transit operations, are declining and the responsibility for supporting transit is falling increasingly on states and localities. In California, the Transportation Development Act (TDA) has become the state's principal source of transit operating subsidies. It is found that the strict per capita allocation formulas of the TDA strongly favor lightly patronized suburban transit service over more heavily patronized service in the central cities. Transit riders in San Francisco, for example, receive a TDA subsidy of $0.13 per trip, whereas the TDA subsidy to transit patrons in suburban Livermore is over $5.00 per trip. The built-in suburban bias of the TDA is the result of partisan compromises made to secure passage of the Act in 1971--compromises to assuage a Republican governor opposed to new taxes--and to include the interests of rural and suburban counties. The result has been a proliferation in California of new, well-funded, and expanding suburban transit operators that attract few riders whereas older, heavily patronized central city transit operators are forced to cut service because of funding shortfalls. This paper concludes by proposing a more efficient and equitable method for allocating TDA funds than the current formula, which, in the name of equity, provides all Californians with a "fair share" of public transit whether or not they use it.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1297, Public Transit Research: Management and Planning 1991.

p. 85-92

1991

Transportation Research Record

0-309-05103-7

Figures (6) ; References (16) ; Tables (6)

Central business districts; Equity (Justice); Public transit; Subsidies; Suburbs

Fund allocations

Finance; Highways; Public Transportation; Society

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

May 8 2009 4:39AM

• BAY AREA EMERGENCY FERRY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION RELIEF AFTER THE OCTOBER 17, 1989, EARTHQUAKE
• CRISIS AND RECOVERY: URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN MOROCCO
• DETERMINING TRANSIT DRUG TEST ACCURACY: THE MULTIDRUG CASE (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE)
• DEVELOPING MARKETS FOR TRANSIT PRIVATIZATION FOR SUBURBAN TRAVEL IN LARGE METROPOLITAN AREAS
• DIRECT-MAIL MARKETING TO NEW RESIDENTS
• LESSONS FROM THE BROOME COUNTY DISTANCE-BASED FARE DEMONSTRATION: EFFECTS OF ZONE FARES AND OFF-PEAK DISCOUNTS ON RIDERSHIP, REVENUE, PAST SALES, AND PUBLIC OPINION
• MULTIVARIATE TIME-SERIES MODEL OF TRANSIT RIDERSHIP BASED ON HISTORICAL, AGGREGATE DATA: THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF HONOLULU (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE)
• PRIVATIZATION OF URBAN TRANSIT: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE
• REGULARITY INDICES FOR EVALUATING TRANSIT PERFORMANCE
• RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURVEYED BEHAVIORAL INTENT AND ACTUAL BEHAVIOR IN TRANSIT USAGE
• SUBWAY RELIABILITY AND THE ODDS OF GETTING THERE ON TIME
• TEMPORAL EFFECTS OF INCIDENTS ON TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
• THE I SYSTEM: A CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY BUS SYSTEM FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHAMPAIGN-URBANA
• TRANSIT-SENSITIVE SUBURBAN LAND USE DESIGN: RESULTS OF A COMPETITION
• TRANSITTOPICS: BOSTON'S NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT SERVICE WORKSHOP PROGRAM
• TUALATIN PARK-AND-RIDE LOT PROGRAM EVALUATION